Search form

Sections

Breast Cancer Backstory: Komen's Decison to Cut Planned Parenthood Funding

Breast Cancer Backstory: Komen's Decison to Cut Planned Parenthood Funding

Update: The Komen Foundation has reversed its decision to pull breast cancer screening funding from Planned Parenthood.

I almost spit out my coffee when I read Washington Post health policy reporter Sarah Kliff's tweet today:

Definitely notable: Komen Foundation cuts off funding to Planned Parenthood b/c its under Congressional investigation. fxn.ws/wSsWRM

- Sarah Kliff (@sarahkliff) January 31, 2012

Notable? That's an understatement, not to mention a local story in almost any community. How will Planned Parenthood affiliates in your community be affected? How do your local Planned Parenthood clinics help patients get breast cancer screenings or treatment – a matter of some controversy? Will women in your area have less access to low-cost or free mammograms – or are there other existing programs that can help? Here's a list of Planned Parenthood affiliates to get you started.

Here's how the AP's David Crary started his story:

The nation's leading breast-cancer charity, Susan G. Komen for the Cure, is halting its partnerships with Planned Parenthood affiliates – creating a bitter rift, linked to the abortion debate, between two iconic organizations that have assisted millions of women.

The change will mean a cutoff of hundreds of thousands of dollars in grants, mainly for breast exams.

breast cancer, abortion, planned parenthood, susan g. komen, reporting on health, health journalismPredictably, both sides of the abortion debate had plenty to say about Komen's decision. Planned Parenthood said Komen caved under pressure from anti-abortion groups, while some pro-life bloggers praised the decision. Komen maintains that it has cut off funding because Planned Parenthood is the subject of a congressional investigation.

Writing in Slate, Amanda Marcotte reflected the dismay of many pro-choice advocates:

Anti-choicers have tried to create a rift between women's health advocates who focus on breast cancer and those who focus on reproductive health concerns below the waist. Today, they had a victory with Komen's act of cowardice.

Kliff tweeted that Komen's decision is likely more significant than the Republican push in the Republican U.S. Representatives to defund Planned Parenthood, which so far have been blocked. She quickly pulled together an impressive analysis, concluding:  

In some ways, the Komen decision isn't particularly surprising. The group has been under pressure from anti-abortion rights groups not to fund Planned Parenthood. It also hired a vice president last year who had previously advocated for the group's defunding in her run for Georgia governor. With a congressional investigation underway, Komen pulled its support. And when private institutions move to cut off Planned Parenthood's funding there's not much Democrats can do. The only possible backstop here might be pressure from Planned Parenthood supporters pushing back in the opposite direction.

Update: The Komen Foundation has disabled downloading of its photos on Flickr (what you see above is a stock photo), as have other Komen Race for the Cure supporters. Story for anyone?

Comments

According to Planned Parenthood, the engine driving the defunding campaign is California's Rep. Stearns: "In abruptly pulling nearly $1,000,000 in funding for breast cancer screenings, the Susan G. Koman foundation cited a sham "investigation" into Planned Parenthood launched by Republican Rep. Cliff Stearns, one of the most militant anti-choice members of Congress. You may recall the so-called investigation was launched by Rep. Stearns last fall after Congress failed to pass bill after bill to defund reproductive health services to women." -- Planned Parenthood

Leaders within the Susan G. Komen for the Cure should be ASHAMED and donors should curtail funding until the organization cleans up its act. According to CharityNavigator.org, Komen for the Cure uses 20% of funds for Administrative and Fundraising expense, leaving only 80% to fund Program expense which is comprised of both education and health care components. Komen website states "we are committed to ending breast cancer forever by energizing science to find the cures and ensuring quality care for all people, everywhere." Yet your actions of hiring Karen Handel and recent decision to curtail providing funding for low-cost breast screening performed at Planned Parenthood facilities prove this to be untrue. Considering your organization is focused on cancer preventative education and early detection healthcare, it is irresponsible that Komen hired an UNHEALTHY woman to make grant-award decisions. Being that Karen Handel is OBESE, her very presence emanates her INABILITY to make wise health-oriented decisions. You can find alternative high quality breast cancer research, education and screening charities to support at CharityNavigator.org or GiveWell.org

Does PP provide mammograms? I heard that the screenings they provide are more like coaching to do self-exams.

Leave A Comment

CONNECT WITH THE COMMUNITY

Member Activities

Martha Rosenberg has shared a blog post

Read it.

William Heisel has shared a blog post

Read it.

Anna Romano has shared a blog post

Read it.

Ryan White has shared a blog post

Read it.

Kellie Schmitt has shared a blog post

Read it.
More Member Activities

Follow Us

ReportingHealth

Reporting on Underserved Communities

How can journalists and foundations collaborate to deepen and improve reporting on underserved communities? Our USC Annenberg School of Journalism program in collaboration with The California Endowment, the Wyncote Foundation and Media Impact Funders, convened 75 leaders from both fields.

Read More »